Randomized controlled trial on lateral augmentation using two collagen membranes: morphometric results on mineralized tissue compound.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Guided bone regeneration is considered an effective tool for gaining mineralized tissue either at exposed implant surface or in deficient alveolar ridge areas before implant placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS Customized casts obtained following impression taking at surgery and re-entry allowed for morphometric assessment of alveolar ridge alterations 6 months after one-stage augmentation of bone dehiscences. In a randomized pilot study using biphasic calcium phosphate tests (n=17) received treatment with ribose cross-linked collagen membranes (RCLM), whereas controls (n=20) received non-cross-linked membranes. The primary endpoint was to quantify the effect of membrane type on dimensional changes in bone margins at crestal level of endosseous implants. RESULTS Soft tissue dehiscencies occurred at 70.5% and 55% frequency for tests and controls, respectively. Gain in clinically hard newly mineralized tissue at the crestal level was significantly higher in test group in lateral (1.8 versus 0.7 mm; p=.046) and in vertical dimensions (1.1 versus 0.2 mm; p=.035) compared with controls. Second measurement obtained at the border of reflected flap revealed no significant difference between groups (3.0 versus 2.1 mm; p=0.57) for lateral dimension. CONCLUSIONS Both collagen devices were effective in bone augmentation. RCLMs supported mineralization process and remodelling even in sites showing compromised healing as indicated by morphometric outcome.
منابع مشابه
Comparison of Hemiseptal Intrabony Defects Treatment with a Bioabsorbable Membrane and Flap Debridement Alone
Introduction: Most periodontal treatments aim to reduce probing depths and maintaining or improving attachment. One of these techniques for treatment of intrabony defects is guided tissue regeneration (GTR). The aim of this study was to compare one-wall intrabony defects treatment with GTR and flap debridement alone. Methods: Eight patients aged 32-43 years participated in this randomized contr...
متن کاملLateral alveolar ridge augmentation procedure using subperiosteal tunneling technique: a pilot study
Background: In this research article, we evaluate the use of sub-periosteal tunneling (tunnel technique) combined with alloplastic in situ hardening biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP, a compound of β-tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite) bone graft for lateral augmentation of a deficient alveolar ridge. Methods: A total of 9 patients with deficient mandibular alveolar ridges were included in t...
متن کاملA comparison on the amount of root coverage by two techniques: Connective tissue graft and bioabsorbable bovine collagen membrane
A comparison on the amount of root coverage by two techniques: Connective tissue graft and bioabsorbable bovine collagen membrane I* - Dr. H. Golestaneh** zDr. M.T. Chitsa * - Assistant professor of Perodontics Dept. Faculty of Dentistry Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. ** - Assistant professor of Perodontics Dept. Faculty of Dentistry Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Background...
متن کاملClinical and histological evaluation of increase in the residual ridge width using mineralized corticocancellous block allografts: A pilot study
Background. Lateral ridge augmentation is conventionally accomplished by means of autogenous bone grafts. However, due to its complications, the application of autogenous bone graft substitutes, e.g. mineralized corticocancellous allograft, is ecommended. Methods. In the present study, twelve patients were included, with insufficient alveolar ridge widths in the designated sites for dental impl...
متن کاملA histologic, histomorphometric, and radiographic comparison between two complexes of CenoBoen/CenoMembrane and Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide in lateral ridge augmentation: A clinical trial
BACKGROUND Several grafting materials have been used for alveolar ridge augmentation. The literature lacks researches to compare CenoBone to other grafting materials. The aim of this study was to compare CenoBone/CenoMembrane complex to Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide complex in lateral alveolar bone augmentation in terms of radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS I...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of clinical periodontology
دوره 38 7 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011